Talk:Beggin' on Your Knees/GA1
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Kyle Peake in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Shoot for the Stars (talk · contribs) 00:34, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 10:44, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a. (reference section):
- b. (citations to reliable sources):
- c. (OR):
- d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a. (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a. (major aspects):
- b. (focused):
- a. (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/fail:
- Pass/fail:
(Criteria marked are unassessed)
I will start this sometime this week. --K. Peake 10:44, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Infobox and lead
edit- Remove the usage of Studios after the ones in the infobox since this is redundant when the parameter is named studio
- Done
- WP:OVERLINK of Shellback under producers
- Done
- I would re-arrange the current opening two sentences, so the first one ends by introducing it as "from the show's debut soundtrack album, Victorious: Music from the Hit TV Show (2011)" and the next then says it was released as the album's second single on April 1, 2011, through those labels mentioned
- Done
- Also, I would place a sentence adding the writing and production credits to the lead as the sentence before the release one to take up some more space here as it is quite short right now
- Done
- "the track is a" → ""Beggin' on Your Knees" is a"
- Done
- "The song was met with generally positive reviews from critics, with the majority of them praising its" → "The song received generally positive from critics, who mostly praised the"
- Done
- ""Beggin' on Your Knees" peaked at" → "It peaked at"
Done
- Wikilink music video and remove "for the track"
- Done
Background
edit- Good
Writing and music
edit- Retitle to Composition and lyrics for a clearer representation of this information
- Done
- "He also provided the recording" → "He provided the recording" as this is separate from writing and production, also avoids overusage of also
- Done
- Remove or replace New York Post per WP:RSP as this is being used for an analysis of song lyrics about cheating problems
- Done
- Add the information about the chorus per [3]
- Done
Critical reception
edit- Per the overly short size of commercial performance, move that to here and retitle to Reception
- Done
- "received positive reviews" → "was met with positive reviews"
- Done
- "gave the song three stars out of five, describing it as a "catchy song" that is "great" → "described the song's catchiness as "great" to be less wordy, also the rating is not needed to be repeated when it is already shown in the box
- Done
- Re-invoke [9] at the end of the first sentence of this para
- Done
- "comparing the tracks lyrics" → "comparing its lyrics" and rather than quoting them all out from this single, write "about the boyfriend "begging on your knees for me""
- Done
Promotion
edit- Wikilink music video
- Done
- "channel on March 22, 2011." → "channel on March 22."
- Done
- [15] does not source any of the info about the carnival sentence
- Source removed
- Regarding the sentence about Justice performing the song throughout 2012, [18] only cites two performances and [19] has nothing about this song so can you source this or alter the prose suitably?
- One source removed. Left the other in where it mentions she performed it.
- Only one of the sources actually mentions Matt Bennett having performed the song
- Removed two of them.
Chart performance
edit- Make this the last para of the reception section
- Done
- [23] is not needed when the other ref backs this up and is the only one to mention the date of April 16
- Not done I feel like this source is important becomes it come from Billboard and also shows that the song debuted at number 83.
- [26] should be at the end of the multiple charts sentence instead
- Done
Credits and personnel
edit- Use
{{spaced ndash}}
so there is the right space between credits and personnel
- Done
Charts
edit- Per WP:USCHARTS, please remove the main US Digital Song Sales chart
- Done
Certifications and sales
edit- Retitle to Certifications
- Done
References
edit- Copyvio score looks strong at 23.1%!!!
- Make sure every ref has an access-date
- Done
- Remove or replace ref 8 per RSP
- Partly done I have removed the New York Post from the composition section but left it referenced for the music videos first release. WP:RSP says it okay to use the New York Post for entertainment coverage. No other source mentions the videos first release other than PRNEWSWIRE. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 22:18, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ditto for ref 15 per WP:PRNEWSWIRE
- Done
- Denver Post → The Denver Post on ref 19 with the wikilink
- I removed the ref from the article.
- Remove or replace ref 21 per WP:RSSM
- Done
- You need to add a proper title to ref 26
- Done
- Add the original URL as well to ref 30
- Not done the original link is broken and doesn't work. Only way to access it is through Internet Archive. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 22:18, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Final comments and verdict
edit- On hold until all of the issues are fixed; done the next day of course! --K. Peake 17:15, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Kyle Peake Thank you so much for the review! It feels so good to be back writing again after so long. I have left my responses above. Look forward to hearing your response. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 22:18, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Shoot for the Stars ✓ Pass now, great job congratulations on your return GA much deserved and you explained well why certain points were not implemented! --K. Peake 08:20, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Kyle Peake Thank you so much for the review! It feels so good to be back writing again after so long. I have left my responses above. Look forward to hearing your response. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 22:18, 30 January 2025 (UTC)